North-south revolt over Crossrail levy

Divided: all firms will have to pay towards the £3.5 billion levy for Crossrail, even if they are not near its east to west path

Boris Johnson was today urged to tear up his planned Crossrail levy so firms in north and south London pay less.

The Mayor wants to raise £3.5billion for the east-west link with a supplementary business rate of 2p on firms with a rateable value of more than £50,000.

However, businesses in boroughs which the £16billion route will not serve directly say they will be unfairly hit by the charge, which is due to be introduced in April.

Enfield and Haringey are part of the North London Strategic Alliance, a group of councils calling on Mr Johnson to introduce a two-tier levy instead. Companies in east, central and west London would still pay the 2p-in-the-pound charge but this would be halved in the south and north.

Ertan Hurer, Enfield's cabinet member for finance, said: "We are in favour of Crossrail but we would like the Mayor to have a re-think on funding. Businesses in north and south London should only face a 1p surcharge on the basis that benefits are limited."

David Williams, leader of Merton council, has also asked Mr Johnson to adopt a tiered tariff. He said: "Those boroughs gaining more from it [Crossrail] should be putting in more." Peter Pledger, chief executive of South London Business, which represents firms south of the river, said: "There is concern that the south London economy will suffer."

The Mayor's office rejected the plea. A spokesman said: "Over the next five years, ratepayers in Westminster will contribute more via the Business Rate Supplement than those in all 20 outer boroughs combined." Business group London First said far more central firms would have to pay the levy because more would hit the £50,000 threshold.

It's grossly unfair'

Max Menon
Finance director, Allders department store, Croydon

"No business in south London will benefit from this. It does not make sense. Parts of this project go to Essex and Berkshire — none of them are contributing and they are major beneficiaries. Having to pay for something that we won't benefit from is grossly unfair. It will improve transport in parts of London but will it help us?"

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Sign up you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy notice .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in