Case against protester who wore mask at pro-Palestine rally is dismissed

Ibrahim Hlaiyil was arrested when he refused to take off his mask which he said he was wearing because he had a bad cough.
The case against Ibrahim Hlaiyil was dismissed at the City of London Magistrates’ Court (Jonathan Brady/PA)
PA Wire
Luke O'Reilly28 February 2024
WEST END FINAL

Get our award-winning daily news email featuring exclusive stories, opinion and expert analysis

I would like to be emailed about offers, event and updates from Evening Standard. Read our privacy notice.

The case against a protester who refused to remove his face covering at a pro-Palestine march in London has been dismissed for procedural reasons.

Ibrahim Hlaiyil, 38, was charged with failing to comply with a requirement to remove a face covering, under Section 60aa of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act.

Mr Hlaiyil was arrested at the protest on October 14 by Pc Dan Quinn after the officer asked him to remove his face covering and he refused, City of London Magistrate’s Court heard on Wednesday.

Under the Act, a police officer has the power to “require any person to remove any item which the constable reasonably believes that person is wearing wholly or mainly for the purpose of concealing his identity”.

There is no evidence to prove the essential element of the charge. The charge must be dismissed at this stage

Judge Michael Snow, trial judge

However, during his evidence, the officer did not say that he believed that Mr Hlaiyil was trying to conceal his identity – a key part of the charge.

Due to this omission, the case against Mr Hlaiyil collapsed.

Judge Michael Snow said that Pc Quinn seemed to have taken the view that he was able to arrest anyone who refused to take off their face mask at the protest.

Judge Snow said: “There is no evidence to prove the essential element of the charge.

“The charge must be dismissed at this stage.”

In a statement read to the court, Mr Hlaiyil said he was wearing the scarf over his face because he had a “bad cough”.

Pc Quinn approached Mr Hlaiyil and asked him to remove the covering.

Mr Hlaiyil said: “I tried to explain to him that it was not a mask.

“He did not listen to me and dragged me away before arresting me.”

In his evidence, Pc Quinn said that Mr Hlaiyil told him that he had “an allergy to particulates”.

However, he said he arrested him as he failed to remove the covering when asked.

He said he would not have told him to remove the covering if it was a medical mask.

After the judge dismissed the case, Mr Hlaiyil burst into tears.

He then hugged his lawyer, Audrey Mogan, and supporters.

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Create Account you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy policy .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in