Man filmed throwing dogs to the ground in sickening act of animal cruelty

WARNING: Article contains content some readers may find upsetting
Chloe Chaplain19 April 2017
WEST END FINAL

Get our award-winning daily news email featuring exclusive stories, opinion and expert analysis

I would like to be emailed about offers, event and updates from Evening Standard. Read our privacy notice.

A man has been banned from owning dogs for a year after he was caught on camera abusing his two pets and throwing them to the floor.

Grant Smith, 22, was secretly filmed threatening his dogs as they cowered on the balcony of his home in Greenwich.

The video shows Smith repeatedly shouting at the dogs - a male Shar Pei cross called Keylo and a female Jack Russell called Ruby - and, at points, appearing to hit them.

He is seen grabbing Ruby by the scruff of her neck and throwing her back into the apartment behind him.

Abuse: The man was caught on camera throwing the two dogs around
RSPCA

He then returns to the balcony and picks up Keylo, who is squirming to get free. He holds him high over his head before slamming the terrified dog to the floor of the flat.

Following an RSPCA investigation, Smith, from Flintmill Crescent, was convicted of two counts of animal cruelty at Bexley Magistrates’ Court.

Abused: The video shows Keylo being threatened by Smith
RSPCA

On Thursday he was banned from keeping dogs for a year and given a 12 month community order as well as being ordered to pay £200 in costs and an £85 victim surcharge.

RSPCA inspector Nick Wheelhouse, who investigated the case, said: “Smith claimed in his defence that this is how mothers treat their puppies, but his behaviour clearly went beyond the boundaries of acceptable treatment and that was reflected in the court’s decision to convict him of two offences.”

Rehomed: Ruby and Keylo are now searching for new homes

Smith was found guilty of failing to meet his dogs’ need to be protected from pain suffering, injury or disease by his threatening behaviour and rough handling, contrary to section 9 of the Animal Welfare Act.

He was also convicted of causing unnecessary suffering to Keylo, contrary to section 4 of the Animal Welfare Act.

The bench found no judgement on two further welfare allegations under section 9 of the Animal Welfare Act.

Magistrates also issued a deprivation order relating to Keylo and Ruby who will hopefully be rehomed by the RSPCA in due course.

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Sign up you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy notice .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in

MORE ABOUT