Boris Johnson gets grilling at Liaison Committee over Owen Paterson

Boris Johnson
PA Wire
WEST END FINAL

Get our award-winning daily news email featuring exclusive stories, opinion and expert analysis

I would like to be emailed about offers, event and updates from Evening Standard. Read our privacy notice.

The Prime Minister was quizzed at the Liaison Committee over whether he thought Owen Paterson was guilty.

Boris Johnson admitted he “may well have been mistaken” in part of his approach to the Westminster sleaze row.

Responding to the question, Mr Johnson said: “I think it was a very sad case but I think there is no question that he had fallen foul of the rules on paid advocacy as far as I could see from the report.

“I think the question people wanted to establish was whether or not given the particularly tragic circumstances he has a fair right to appeal.”

When told Paterson had already been given an appeal, the Prime Minister said he acted “in the spirit of compassion”.

“In forming the impression that the former member of North Shropshire had not had a fair process, I may well have been mistaken but that was certainly the impression that many people seems to have,” he told MPs.

He added once more he did think it a mistake but it was “a particularly difficult case”.

“It is not often when a colleague suffers a family bereavement in the course of an investigation,” he continued.

“There was quite a lot of feeling about it and for that reason in the spirit of compassion, I thought it might be useful to see whether there was any cross party support.”

The Prime Minster told of his regret over the handling of the Westminster sleaze scandal when questioned by MPs.

Mr Johnson told the Commons his initial reaction was to insist paid advocacy and lobbying is against the rules and anybody who does so should be properly penalised.

He added, in retrospect, he was “obviously mistaken” in his later approach.

“The intention was not to exonerate anybody,” he continued. “The intention was to see whether there was some way on a cross party basis we could improve the system.

“In retrospection, it was obviously obviously mistaken to think that we could conflate the two things. Do I regret that decision? Yes I certainly do.”

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Create Account you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy policy .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in