Ruling awaited over whether PSNI is suitable to investigate Troubles cases

Seven Supreme Court judges, who oversaw a remote hearing which lasted three days, said they would deliver a ruling on a date to be fixed.
The headstone of Jean Smyth in Milltown cemetery in Belfast (Brian Lawless/PA)
PA Archive
Brian Farmer16 June 2021

Senior officers are waiting for Supreme Court justices to decide whether the Police Service of Northern Ireland is sufficiently independent to carry out investigations into two events during the Troubles in Ulster half a century ago.

Seven judges based in London on Wednesday finished hearing arguments relating to proposed police investigations into the killing of a Catholic woman in 1972 and the treatment of 12 people, who have become known as the “hooded men”, detained in 1971.

Lord Hodge, Lord Lloyd-Jones, Lord Kitchin, Lord Sales, Lord Hamblen, Lord Leggatt, and Lord Burrows were asked to consider issues relating to the shooting of 24-year-old Jean Smyth in Belfast and the detention of the “hooded men”, following rulings by judges in Northern Ireland.

The seven judges, who oversaw a remote hearing which lasted three days, said they would deliver a ruling on a date to be fixed.

The headstone of Jean Smyth (Brian Lawless/PA)
PA Archive

A barrister representing Mrs Smyth’s sister, Margaret McQuillan, and Francis McGuigan, one of the “hooded men”, told judges that the cases were of the “utmost seriousness”.

Hugh Southey QC said, in a written case outline, that one case concerned the fatal shooting of an “unarmed young mother”, in circumstances “implicating British Army personnel”.

He said the other concerned “state-sanctioned torture and/or inhuman and degrading treatment”.

Mr Southey said two issues arose in both cases, the “applicability of investigatory obligation” imposed by articles of the European Convention on Human Rights and the independence of the Police Service of Northern Ireland.

He argued that Mrs Smyth’s sister and Mr McGuigan were entitled to “effective, independent investigation” and told judges that the Police Service of Northern Ireland lacked the “requisite independence to investigate”.

Francis McGuigan, one of the 14 ‘Hooded’ men (Brian Lawless/PA)
PA Archive

Barrister Tony McGleenan QC, who represented the Police Service of Northern Ireland, told judges that the force did not lack the independence to investigate.

Amnesty International which has supported a campaign by the “hooded men”, wants independent investigations.

Grainne Teggart, Amnesty International’s Northern Ireland campaign manager, said, before the hearing, that the “hooded men” case would be “hugely significant” to “torture victims across the world” and to the ongoing “unresolved issue of legacy of the troubles”.

Lawyers representing the Police Service of Northern Ireland had asked the Supreme Court to consider the case, following court hearings in Northern Ireland.

Judges heard arguments from lawyers representing Northern Ireland Secretary Brandon Lewis.

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Sign up you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy notice .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in