Human rights question over fees

Students in London protest against the hike in tuition fees, which may contravene human rights
12 April 2012

Charging university students up to £9,000 a year in tuition fees may contravene human rights law.

The hike - agreed by MPs in the Commons last week - may be open to challenge because it could discriminate against poorer students.

A legal opinion, published by Public Interest Lawyers (PIL), says it is plain that students from less well-off backgrounds will not be able to pay back the debts incurred if fees hit this level.

Ethnic minority groups are over-represented in the poorer sections of UK society, it says, and so a disproportionate number of students from these groups could be prevented from going to university.

The opinion, by barristers at Matrix Chambers, says: "There are in our view concerns as to whether the proposed changes would pass muster given that the burden of proof is on the state to justify retrogressive steps.

"In our view, there appear to have been alternative means open to the Government which might have reduced the likely disproportionate impact. In particular, it is not clear whether the likely advantages of a graduate tax or the possibility of means-testing in setting fees, as regards access to university by lower-income students (this because it avoids the problem of debt) have been adequately taken into account."

PIL solicitor Phil Shiner said: "The coalition Government need to take urgent legal advice as they have clearly not thought about the human rights implications of their proposal. Whole tranches of our society will now be excluded from higher education. It is blindingly obvious that using the so-called financial crisis as a guise, this Government has set out to permanently change higher education to one based on elitism."

But a spokesman for the Department for Business Innovation and Skills said: "Our package is designed to extend social mobility, not restrict it.

"It is irresponsible to claim that people from poorer backgrounds will not be able to go to university. Indeed, independent analysis by the IFS has shown that our proposals are more progressive than the current system.

"Under our plans, there are no upfront fees and graduates don't make any repayments until they are in well-paid employment. There is a more generous maintenance package than now, as well as a new National Scholarship Programme targeting prospective students from disadvantaged backgrounds."

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Create Account you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy policy .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in