Lib Dems: VAT rise 'unavoidable'

Danny Alexander, right, has said the VAT rise in George Osborne's Budget was 'unavoidable'
12 April 2012

Increasing VAT to 20% in the Budget was "unavoidable", a senior Liberal Democrat minister has said.

Treasury Chief Secretary Danny Alexander said the move - which his party vigorously opposed in the general election campaign - was the only alternative to still deeper spending cuts.

Chancellor George Osborne announced the hike as part of what he said was a "tough but fair" emergency package of tax increases and spending cuts on a scale unseen in decades.

A massive £11 billion benefits squeeze was also included in a harsh austerity package he said would clear the structural deficit by the time of the next general election in 2015. More pain will follow in the autumn spending review when Government departments whose budgets are not ring-fenced face cuts in the order of 25%, he warned.

He sought to soften the blow by restoring the state pension link to earnings from next year, raising income tax allowances for basic rate payers and a £2 billion boost for poor families.

However the VAT measure sparked deep unease among Liberal Democrats as Labour accused them of acting as "fig leaves" for a Budget that would still hit the most vulnerable hardest.

Colchester MP Bob Russell issued a stark warning to the leadership, declaring: "I can't see myself at the moment voting for the Budget." He said he had told voters less than 50 days ago that he was opposed to a VAT rise - which was predicted as a potential "Tory Bombshell" in a major party poster campaign.

Mr Alexander, who was applauded when he addressed a meeting of the party's MPs after the statement, denied misleading voters.

"What we actually said in the election was that we would seek to reduce the deficit through spending but only if, on the grounds of fairness, we needed additional tax rises would we seek one. And on VAT, we have a choice: if the structural deficit is £12 billion larger than the previous government told us - do we fill that with yet more spending cuts or do we choose a tax measure.

"We want to see income tax thresholds rise to help with incentives to work. That means VAT was the unavoidable choice," he said.

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Create Account you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy policy .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in