Mulcaire loses hacking case appeal

Glenn Mulcaire has lost his appeal against orders that he cannot rely on privilege against self-incrimination in court proceedings
12 April 2012

The private investigator at the centre of the phone-hacking scandal has lost his appeal against orders that he cannot rely on privilege against self-incrimination in the proceedings.

Glenn Mulcaire, who was jailed for six months in January 2007 for illegally accessing the voicemails of members of the royal household, challenged rulings that he did not have the right to refuse to say who asked him to intercept voice messages.

The orders were made in response to applications made by comedian and actor Steve Coogan and PR consultant Nicola Phillips in the run-up to their civil damages claims for breach of confidence against both News Group Newspapers (NGN) and Mulcaire, whom NGN had exclusively retained.

Three judges in the Court of Appeal, headed by the Lord Chief Justice, Lord Judge, refused Mulcaire permission to appeal their ruling, but granted a stay until 5pm on Monday pending an application for permission to the Supreme Court itself.

In a statement issued through his solicitor, Sarah Webb, Mulcaire, who was not in court, said there was no dispute that he was entitled to invoke the long-standing common law privilege against self-incrimination, subject to Section 72 of the Senior Courts Act 1981, on which the appeal hinged.

"I am pleased that the Court of Appeal has recognised that this privilege remains a part of our common law. It has also emphasised that it cannot be removed in civil proceedings without safeguards for the person at risk of prosecution.

"Though it considered that the Act removed my privilege in these two cases, the Court of Appeal considered the arguments put forward on my behalf in great detail in its judgment. It acknowledged that those arguments 'appear to be of some general significance'. I intend to appeal this ruling to the Supreme Court, because this may affect my right to claim the privilege in other civil cases still being brought against me."

Mr Coogan's solicitor, John Kelly of Schillings, said later: "This is a very significant decision and is a landmark ruling in the area of privilege against self-incrimination. The Coogan decision is likely to be relied upon by other phone hacking victims to assist them in their cases against NGN and Mulcaire."

A statement issued later on behalf of Miss Phillips said: "Nicola Phillips is delighted that the appeal against the order of Mr Justice Mann has been dismissed and that an application to the Court of Appeal for permission to appeal to the Supreme Court has been refused.

"Miss Phillips hopes that she will soon get the answers that she wants as to who from the News of the World instructed Glenn Mulcaire. She is naturally disappointed to see that Mr Mulcaire has indicated that he will ask the Supreme Court for permission to appeal further. Mr Mulcaire's legal costs are being paid by News Group Newspapers."

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Create Account you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy policy .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in