Partial victory for G20 kettle duo

Two campaigners have partially won a High Court battle over police 'kettling' tactics used at the Camp for Climate Action in London
12 April 2012

Two climate change campaigners have partially won their High Court battle over controversial "kettling" tactics used by the police during G20 demonstrations in central London two years ago.

Student Hannah McClure and Josh Moos, a campaigner for Plane Stupid, challenged the legality of the "violent" restraint methods used against them at the Camp for Climate Action in Bishopsgate on April 1 2009.

On Thursday the High Court ruled that the kettle could not be justified when it was imposed at 7.07pm, although it could have become necessary later in the evening to seal off side roads and impose a cordon to the north of the camp.

Two judges also said they were "not persuaded" that a "pushing operation against a 15-person deep crowd" was "reasonably necessary".

The climate camp kettle involved a tight police cordon being enforced round demonstrators for more than four hours.

Sir Anthony May, who is president of the Queen's Bench Division, and Mr Justice Sweeney rejected the campaigners' complaint that the police decided unlawfully to clear the climate camp before it was due to end.

The judges ruled: "The police had a duty to clear the highway, which could not be done without removing the protesters by force if necessary. If there were individual occasions when the force used may have been excessive, that is a matter for individual complaint, not for these judicial review proceedings."

The legality of police using riot shields to hit individuals - so-called "shield strikes" - was also called into question in the legal challenge.

The judges ruled: "The policy and training about the use of shields as it came over to us in the evidence appeared to be insufficient for individual circumstances. There needed to be clear-cut instructions as to whether shield strikes were ever justified, and, if so, when."

The demonstrators were represented by John Halford, of Bindmans solicitors, who said the court had "roundly condemned" the police actions: "To date, there have been few signs of a change in police attitudes and tactics since G20. This judgment could not give a clearer signal that that must happen immediately."

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Create Account you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy policy .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in

MORE ABOUT