Hong Kong says UK judges’ resignations were ‘politically motivated’

Hong Kong leader Carrie Lam
Getty Images
Bill McLoughlin31 March 2022

The departure of British judges from Hong Kong’s court of appeal was “politically motivated”, Carrie Lam has said.

Robert Reed and Patrick Hodge announced their resignation from Hong Kong’s court of final appeal on Wednesday.

Ms Lam, Hong Kong’s chief executive, said the pair had been put under political pressure to leave during a press conference on Thursday.

She said: “The resignations are politically motivated. They have been put under political pressure and that is a kind of political manipulation.”

Foreign secretary Liz Truss said it was “no longer tenable” for serving UK judges to sit in Hong Kong’s top court due to the erosion of human rights and democratic freedoms.

Speaking after the departure of the two judges, Ms Lam added: “I remain very confident that we still have very fine judges in the judiciary, both local and from overseas.

“Hong Kong will continue to benefit significantly.”

British judges have served in Hong Kong’s judiciary since the territory was returned in 1997, but the Foreign Office argued that China had used the legislation “to undermine the fundamental rights and freedoms of the people of Hong Kong”.

Police special tactical squad detain a protester (C) in Wanchai, Hong Kong on May 24, 2020
AFP via Getty Images

The Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office also said the security law constituted a breach of the 1984 Sino-British Joint Declaration that paved the way for the handover.

Ms Truss said: "We have seen a systematic erosion of liberty and democracy in Hong Kong.

"Since the national security law was imposed, authorities have cracked down on free speech, the free press and free association.

"The situation has reached a tipping point where it is no longer tenable for British judges to sit on Hong Kong’s leading court, and would risk legitimising oppression.

"I welcome and wholeheartedly support the decision to withdraw British judges from the court."

In September 2020, Australian judge James Spigelman, resigned from the court of final appeal due to the security law.

The law, which was passed in June 2020, punishes any act of secession, subversion, terrorism or any collusion with foreign or external forces.

Key provisions also allow some trials to be heard behind closed doors while those suspected of breaking the law may be put under surveillance.

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Sign up you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy notice .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in