MPs urge aid to help collect tax

MPs said tax revenues offered countries a better route out of poverty than reliance on foreign aid
23 August 2012

Britain's international aid effort should concentrate more on helping developing countries to ensure they collect their own taxes properly, MPs have said.

The Commons International Development Committee said that a reliable flow of tax revenues offered countries a far better route out of poverty than reliance on foreign aid donations.

It urged the Department for International Development to support the revenue authorities in developing nations to improve the collection rates of income tax, VAT and local property taxes.

Committee chairman Sir Malcolm Bruce said: "The aim of development work is to enable developing countries to escape from over-reliance on aid. Supporting revenue authorities is one of the best ways of doing this: it represents excellent value for money, both for the countries concerned and for UK taxpayers."

The committee said it was essential that the governing "elites" within developing countries paid - and, critically, were seen to pay - the correct amounts in personal taxation.

The report also expressed concern that recent changes to the controlled foreign companies rules - which no longer apply to UK-owned companies operating exclusively outside the UK - could make it easier for those firms to use tax havens.

The move has dismayed aid agencies, with ActionAid estimating that it could cost developing countries up to £4 billion in lost tax revenues, and the committee said the Government should consider reversing the changes "as a matter of urgency".

"The Government is committed to supporting economic growth in developing countries to reduce their dependency on aid. While this is clearly the right thing to do, it would be deeply unfortunate if the Government's efforts were undermined by its own tax rules," Sir Malcolm said.

Lucia Fry, ActionAid's head of policy, welcomed the report and urged the Government to accept the committee's recommendations on the controlled foreign companies rules. However, the Treasury said the controlled foreign company rules were there to protect UK tax revenues and were not designed to protect those of other countries. The changes were designed to encourage investment and drive growth in the UK.

Shadow Treasury chief secretary Rachel Reeves said: "It is astounding that given the rhetoric coming from the coalition on tax avoidance, that despite warm words from Liberal Democrats, we were voted down by coalition MPs on this issue. Labour has been pushing for over a year for proper studies into the impact of these changes."

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Sign up you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy notice .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in